God level scam baiting from @Kitboga
and an actually useful use case for AI for a change!
Too funny 😁
If you agree with the below, please consider donating to support the valuable work of @AnitaPosch @BFFbtc
Some of you like to point out that innovation on #Bitcoin Lightning is faster than they what can keep up with. As for me, I'm even struggling to keep up with everything new happening in @lnbits alone.
We're reaching escape velocity 🚀
So twitter seems to be suggesting a correlation between the rise in sudden adult death syndrome and...
want to discuss the rise in sudden adult death syndrome ... https://twitter.com/LatAm_hodl/status/1572682803812372481
Poor thing is offended 😪
Meanwhile marginalised communities continue to find use cases in the real world, and bitcoiners continue to innovate in the energy space 🤷♂️
Personally I am not even sure which #Bitcoin fiction I find the most offensive
- Bitcoin is good for the environment
- Bitcoin is good for marginalized communities
Just one week to go now freaks!
Calling all #bitcoin plebs in the Brighton & Hove area. Come join us for a 🍺 and chat next Wednesday evening. https://twitter.com/brighton_btc/status/1569981798977011712
I am willing to sell Bitcoin Magazine to @CalvinAyre and @Dr_CSWright for the measly price of 1 satoshi paid out from Bitcoin's first block. LMK when you're ready. https://twitter.com/mariodavisjr/status/1570824121931669505
Who has the first fuckytoshi meme? 😂
*hopefully sooner, the judge said
Yup, latest Guy's Take was pure 🔥
The recent @TheGuySwann take on #bitcoin maximalism was so fuckn epic I am just filled with so much joy.
To finish, fully agree with the sentiments of Dustin Trammell. The defense of the eye witnesses was very weak. And when someone proves IN COURT to lie and has the nerves to drop forgeries in the case, it should be over and out.
I'm absolutely shocked that Wright's costs would appear to be larger than expected. I'm sure he's been 100% honest with the filing.
Haukaas says most of their cost is related to the complexity of the defence's evidence. He objects to the size of Wright's costs.
Says the copyright comment is not verifiable. Shows the "2008" version includes a bugfix that was included in a post 0.1.0 version of the public code. So the bug was fixed, reintroduced, and fixed again?